“Twelve Angry Men” – A Critical Analysis Essay Example

 

12 angry men analysis essay

Analysis Of ' Twelve Angry Men ' Essay - Extend Analysis 12 Angry Men Justice is a concept that is crucial for a fair and just society. For hundreds of years, countries have developed constitutions and other documents in place to form justice for those within the country. 12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and mariemaripes.ga: Reginald Rose. Nov 07,  · 12 Angry Men Movie Analysis Words | 4 Pages. Twelve Angry Men Analysis BA Reaching a unanimous vote, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a difficult task for the jurors represented in the film, 12 Angry Men.


12 Angry Men Essay | Bartleby


The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father.

A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the 12 angry men analysis essay and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty, 12 angry men analysis essay. Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty.

The rest of the jury resents the inconvenience of his decision. After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 Henry Fonda by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour.

Eventually, as the talks proceed juror 8 slowly undermines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is widely available to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect. Gradually they are won over by his arguments and even the most narrow minded of his fellow jurors hesitantly agrees with him. Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. Arriving at an unanimous not guilty verdict does not come easily. The jury encounters many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with each other.

Although the movie deals with issues relating to the process of effective communication this paper will focus of two reasons why they encounter difficulties and how they overcome them. First, we will apply the Johari grid theory and see how it applies to their situation. If we analyze the Johari grid of each juror we see a large hidden area in the case of all of the men.

Take into consideration, each man is referred to by a juror number, they do not even have the benefit of knowing each others names. These men have never talked before. Each of them come from different situations with individual and unique experiences. The public area consists solely of the shared information provided during the trial. Their hidden area is immense, resulting in an equally large blind area. The public, hidden and blind areas are relatively the same for each juror before beginning the deliberation.

It is the size of the unconscious area that will differ more among the men, 12 angry men analysis essay. We will see how the contents of the unconscious area will largely affect the decision making process of some of the jurors. The information contained in the unconscious area is unrecognized, it is often the most difficult to overcome.

He levels with the others by openly admitting that he does not know if the boy killed 12 angry men analysis essay father and solicits feedback in order to make an accurate decision.

The movie illustrates the process of leveling and soliciting feedback which can make all the difference. The character with the largest hidden window is the boy on trial.

One man in particular, Juror 3 Lee J. Cobb has a sizable unconscious area. He has a troubled relationship with his own son that preoccupies his thoughts. This is alluded to in a conversation between juror 7 Jack Warden and himself.

The broken relationship with his son preoccupies his thoughts at several times throughout the movie; he is found staring at the picture. His interpersonal style would be classified as a blabbermouth. He is neither open or receptive. He has his opinion and loves to share it. The net result is a large blind area. He is unwilling or unable to level with the others and is also unreceptive to any feedback.

Most likely the 12 angry men analysis essay of these feelings and the effect it has on his perceptions is unconscious to him. Eventually, he finds himself the only one maintaining a vote of guilty. He feels his sense of reality is in question and it threatens him. This puts him 12 angry men analysis essay the defensive.

He bursts, accusing the others of being 12 angry men analysis essay. His defenses start to crumble as his unconscious emotions become visible to him. By recognizing his unconscious emotions, essentially what he has done is level with himself, 12 angry men analysis essay.

Once he did this he realized the anger and frustration with regards to his son has been misdirected toward the accused. With a new understanding of himself he is able to change his vote 12 angry men analysis essay not guilty. Another issue dealt with in the movie is prejudice. Prejudice is defined as premature judgment or bias. In a trial situation Jurors are asked to only consider the evidence presented to them.

Individual biases are not expected to affect the decision making process. Unfortunately, leaving our prejudices outside the court room door is near impossible. As the movie demonstrates prejudice can distort our views and greatly affects our ability to make accurate assessments. By nature! You know what I mean? While most of the men are aware of the stigma attached to people from the ghetto they are willing to try to put the stereotype aside. His outburst has caused quite a disturbance in the room.

This disturbance serves two purposes. It is always easier to overcome an objection if you know what it is. Having this knowledge allows for a more productive communication, thereby convincing him that he should change his vote.

Secondly, it allows him to vent his frustrations. In doing so, he realizes the power of his emotions which forces him to step back and take a look at what he really feels.

The look on his face shows he has a realization. For the first time he understands his prejudices have affected his perceptions. This new understanding of himself enables him to think more clearly and objectively. Yet the boy, a product of the same community is an assumed liar. As the movie closes the not guilty verdict is handed down, 12 angry men analysis essay. It is not known if the boy is guilty or innocent, that will forever remain in his hidden area.

Henry Fonda Juror 8 entered the trial with an open mind, he managed to convince the others to do the same. The movie illustrates that everything is not what it appears to be. Being aware of this is the first step to better understanding. Article last reviewed: St. Juror 3 Jack Klugman responds to the negative comments by informing them that he too is from the ghetto. Very well analysed and presented. It was a tremendous help in assisting my Yr 9 son on his school home assessment.

Skip to content. Shakespeare's Sonnet Analysis, 12 angry men analysis essay. Most reacted comment. Hottest comment thread. Recent comment authors. Michelle W. Richie J. It only takes seconds! Upload your Homework.

 

12 Angry Men Essay Questions | GradeSaver

 

12 angry men analysis essay

 

12 Angry Men is a good example of group and individual behavior. It clearly illustrates the pressure of conformity and groupthink. A group can be defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who come together to achieve a particular objective. In the movie 12 Jurors come together with the sole obligation of concluding [ ]. 12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and mariemaripes.ga: Reginald Rose. Get Your Custom Essay on “Twelve Angry Men” – A Critical Analysis Just from $13,9/Page Get Essay This essay will explore some of the elements of Critical thinking found within the context of this remarkable movie, and will show that rational reason and logic when used effectively can overcome the mostly ineffective rush to judgement that.